Journal

Should my successor have a mentor from outside the family?

By ·

An adult's hands guiding a child's hands on clay at a potter's wheel

In most cases, yes. An outside mentor gives your successor what the family cannot: an experienced person with no stake in the family’s decisions, who can listen, challenge and share how they handled similar moments. The best candidates have led a business, ideally through a succession. Agree clear expectations and confidentiality at the start, and keep the mentor separate from the family’s decisions.

Mentoring and coaching are different things, and a successor may need one, the other or both. Executive coaching vs mentoring for a family successor explains the difference and when each fits. This article is about the mentor: why one from outside the family, how to find the right person and what to ask of them.

Why look outside the family?

You may already be mentoring your successor, and you know the business better than anyone. An outside mentor does not replace that. It adds something you cannot provide, however much you want to.

  • No stake in the outcome. An outside mentor is not an heir, a shareholder or a parent. They have nothing to gain from any particular decision, which makes their view easier to trust.
  • Somewhere to speak freely. Your successor will have doubts, frustrations and questions about you, about siblings and about the role itself. Many of these cannot be said at home or at the office.
  • A second model of leadership. If the founder is the only leader a successor has watched closely, the founder becomes the only reference. Seeing how someone else runs a business, and makes different choices, widens the picture.
  • Experience of the transition. Someone who has taken over from a parent, or handed over to a child, knows what it feels like from the inside.
  • Relief for you. You do not have to be parent, boss and mentor at the same time.

Who makes a good mentor?

The right person is usually one of these:

  • A leader of another family business, preferably one who has been through a succession on either side.
  • A retired chief executive or senior executive, from the same industry or a neighbouring one.
  • An experienced non-executive director from another company.

The qualities matter more than the title:

  • They listen more than they talk.
  • They will talk honestly about their own mistakes, not only their successes.
  • They have the time, and will keep it.
  • They are discreet, and known to be.
  • They do not need the relationship, for money, status or access to the family.

A few people are usually better avoided as the main mentor. A close friend of the founder may feel loyal to you, and your successor may sense it. A member of your own board has a governance role that sits awkwardly with confidential mentoring. Anyone who advises the family or has a commercial relationship with the business has a conflict, however well they manage it.

How do you find one?

  • Ask your advisors. Private bankers, lawyers, accountants and family business advisors know many leaders and often know who would do this well.
  • Use peer networks. Family business associations, industry bodies and regional business groups.
  • Ask your board or trusted directors for names from their own networks, rather than for themselves.
  • Look at your own network carefully, with the caution above about people too close to you.

Then let your successor choose. Suggest two or three names and let them meet each one. The relationship only works if your successor wants it, and chemistry is not something you can decide on their behalf.

Some mentors do this informally, others in a paid advisory capacity. Either can work. What matters is that the arrangement is clear from the start, including any payment, so nobody is left guessing.

What should you ask of the mentor?

A short conversation at the beginning prevents most problems later. Agree:

  • A rhythm. Something like one conversation a month, for an agreed period, with a point to review whether it is still useful.
  • Confidentiality, including from you. The mentor should not report to you on what your successor says. If you expect updates, the successor will not speak freely and the arrangement loses most of its value.
  • Honesty with the successor. A mentor who only reassures is pleasant company and little use.
  • No sides in family matters. The mentor can help your successor think about a sibling or about you. They should not become a participant.
  • Experience, not instructions. “Here is what I did, and what I would do differently” is mentoring. “Here is what you should do” is something else.
  • Knowing the limits. Legal, tax, financial and personal health questions belong with the right professional, and a good mentor will say so.

It helps to write the basics down in a few lines, so the mentor, the successor and you have the same understanding.

What are the common pitfalls?

  • The mentor as the parent’s proxy. A mentor chosen to pass on the founder’s views, or who reports back, will be recognised quickly. The successor will stop being candid, and may stop trusting you.
  • A second founder. Some mentors expect their way to be followed. Their experience is valuable, but it came from a different company and often a different era.
  • Advice without practice. A mentor can tell your successor how to handle a hostile director. Knowing what to do and being able to do it under pressure are different things. That gap is where coaching and rehearsal come in.
  • Mixed roles. A mentor who later joins the board, invests in the business or starts advising you has changed role. Discuss it openly if it happens.
  • Drift. Without a review point, mentoring can fade into occasional lunches. Agree when you will check whether it is still useful.
  • Too many voices. A successor with a mentor, a coach, a board, a parent and several advisors can end up with no clear view of their own. One outside mentor is usually enough.

How do you know it is working?

You will not know the content, and you should not. You can notice other things. Your successor uses the time and keeps the appointments. They seem clearer about decisions and less dependent on your view. They mention, occasionally and unprompted, that a conversation helped. If you want to know more, ask your successor whether it is useful, not what was said.

If you are also considering a coach for the practice side, how to choose a coach for your successor covers what to look for.

In short

  • An outside mentor offers a successor what the family cannot: an experienced view with no stake in the outcome.
  • Look for leaders who have been through a succession, and avoid people too close to the founder or the business.
  • Suggest a shortlist and let your successor choose.
  • Agree rhythm, confidentiality from the parent, and limits at the start.
  • A mentor shares experience; they do not replace practice under pressure.

If you are weighing what else your successor needs alongside a mentor, the Second Chair™ method describes the practice side of the preparation.

The handover will happen either way.

Request a private conversation